▶️ARE US BANKS MANIPULATING GOLD PRICES?
CME Raises Margins to Deliberately Crush Gold, Silver Prices?
JPM and US Banks Short Silver on Verge of Bankruptcy, Need Lower Prices to Exit Positions?
Rising Gold Hurts Economy as Consumers Hoard Cash?
If You Missed Our Best Recent Articles:
“When monetary policy substitutes for fiscal discipline, inflation is no longer a mystery - it is a choice.”
“When monetary policy substitutes for fiscal discipline, inflation is no longer a mystery - it is a choice.”
- Kevin Warsh
Last Week's Trading Session Captures Market Jitters Over Kevin Warsh.
Government bonds bought at the front end of the curve, long-term yields cool. USD strengthens. Equities slide, with Russell 2000 hit hardest, while Nasdaq and S&P 500 face milder pressure. Precious metals plunge, silver down over 30% in one swoop.
At first glance, it looks like technical reaction. But it signals something deeper: markets repricing the Fed's role in the US economic order.
For over a decade, investors grew accustomed to a clear playbook:
whenever volatility spiked, the Fed expanded its balance sheet; whenever growth faltered, the Fed became the ultimate backstop for assets and fiscal policy.
Kevin Warsh doesn't deny the Fed's stabilizing role in crises. But he questions a baked-in assumption: should the Fed maintain that role as a permanent state?
Current market logic still seems sound: if Trump wants low rates, fast growth, Main Street support-why pick someone who shuns QE, rejects Fed put promises, and openly blasts balance-sheet bloat?
That logic holds only in a static model-where low rates, QE, and growth always align, and the cost of 'protection' is assumed infinite.
But the US economy under Trump 2.0 no longer runs on that model.
In a system where:
fiscal policy has crossed the pretend-it's-sustainable threshold,
the Fed's balance sheet has turned political,
and currency is viewed as national power,
...the question isn't 'cut rates or not,' but who bears the discipline after rates are cut.
Thus, the central question isn't:
“Is Kevin Warsh dovish enough to please markets?”
But:
“Who can run a Fed when monetary, fiscal, and national security converge?”
At that level, monetary policy ceases to be a pure technical tool. It becomes power design: who gets protected, who adjusts, and where the ultimate costs land.
In that framework, picking Kevin Warsh isn't a personal gamble. It's a signal Trump seeks not a compliant Fed, but one willing to embrace conflict to restore order.
This Week, Viethustler Breaks It Down in 5 Parts:
Part I – Trump 2.0 and Why the Fed Became the 'Strategic Bottleneck'
Part II – Kevin Warsh Isn't a Personal Pick, But the Product of an Economic Coalition
Part III – How Warsh Differs from Powell: Not Hawk vs. Dove, But Power Philosophy
Part IV – AI, Productivity, and the Piece the Current Fed Is Missing
Part V – Fed Over the Next 4 Years: Interest Rates, Balance Sheet, USD and How Markets Must Relearn Pricing
The ultimate conclusion isn't whether Kevin Warsh will be a 'hawk' or a 'dove.' Nor is it whether Trump will respect the Fed's independence.
It's a colder reality of systemic economics:
In an order where currency determines resilience, power lies not in how well you soothe markets, but in who dares to withdraw the safety net when it has become the problem itself.
